I went for an HIV
test yesterday. This is the first time
that my job has directly influenced decisions about my health. In fact, I have caught myself thinking
differently about all kinds of things since last summer: how important it is for
people to be able to explain their experiences themselves; how lack of
education prevents some experiences from ever being shared with a wider public;
how NGOs can maybe help to bridge the gap…but most of these thoughts haven’t
changed how I act. So, the way the
brainwave “I am responsible for my sexual health” translated into a trip to the
local STI clinic was unusual.
By coincidence,
the evening before I went to the clinic, a friend had sent me a translated
short story about someone getting tested for HIV in Taiwan (see the link below,
if you are interested in reading it yourself – the website itself is also worth
a look).
The story was depressing, yet
too different from own experiences for me to identify very much with the main
character. On the other hand, it did
make me stop and think for the shortest of moments about what it might be like
to be someone else going for a HIV test – a young Chinese guy, or someone 20
years ago.
The test itself
was over in less than 30 minutes, and the people at the clinic were
professional and incurious. This was a
surprise, as I had assumed that I would be treated to a round of nosey,
flirtatious questions from the gay Chinese staff. Being foreign in China isn’t what it used to
be. I haven’t ever tested in the UK, so
I can’t make a meaningful comparison in terms of service quality, but few
clinics in Beijing are open outside normal office hours. For people who work, this obviously adds to
the inconvenience – little wonder that some people choose to buy self test-kits
that they can use at home.
The thing that
most struck me happened at the end though.
I asked if I could make a donation to the NGO that runs the clinic,
because the staff there don’t have any kind of salary at all, just a small
allowance that covers lunch and not much else.
My suggestion took them aback.
Although they were grateful for the suggestion, they not only refused
it, they also added that they didn’t want to be in some kind of “master-servant
relationship” with the clients. In other
words, they didn’t want to receive a donation, because in some way that would
reduce them to the level of servants. I
understood where they were coming from, but wanted to shake them at the same
time – more money means they can provide an even better service – perhaps the money could be used to pay for new
equipment, or technical training, or…the list goes on. Do they think they are “above” money? That somehow their organization doesn’t need
money to get by? But I didn’t say any of
this.
In fact, after I left,
I thought about this some more. I may be
spinning my conclusions beyond the realms of the available evidence, but it
seems to me that the staff would rather provide an OK service with a
take-it-or-leave-it attitude, than provide a truly excellent service that would
require them to take on board the comments (including the potential criticism)
of the clients. It’s not unusual to hear
foreigners lamenting the lack of “service culture” in China, but perhaps this
is where it comes from.
One other thing
this week that I really want to share
– Blade Runner. Go and see it! Like the Island of Dr. Moreau, and basically
any other good sci-fi, it asks what it is that makes us human. Memories?
Empathy? Love? At the end of their life, who won’t be left mourning
the loss of “all those moments….like tears in the rain.”?




